Cumulative Spectral Decay Plots (waterfall) - Free Air, Bare Driver - Page 2.


ERROR REPORT - 21 March 2003

Suspended one-sided RD-75 dipole baffle showing microphone stand.

As can be seen in the photo at left and in the preceeding photos the free air measurement condition involved a 1 5/8" thick diameter tall microphone stand created from closet rods. As can be seen in the photo, the Mitey Mic capsule is only the length of the probe, and slightly offset, from the microphone stand.

Despite the small pieces of foam over the microphone probe, it will be shown that there was a significant reflection from the stand recorded in the measured data.

Shown below is a screen capture of the IMP/MLS display (640 x 350 pixels) that was created for this correction. A decision to use the 3m free air impulse data instead of the 1m data was made on the basis of practical listening distance - the reflection problem appears in all the free air 1m, 2m, and 3m impulse data.

The 3m impulse of the bare RD-75 driver suspended in free air is shown in the bottom window of the display at a "normal" screen gain of x1. The duration of the plot is 66.65mS. A windowing marker is seen at the beginning of the impulse. One can clearly see a least three areas of 'reflections' following the impulse.

In the upper window is the 57.9mS windowed portion of the impulse multiplied x5. The seriousness of the reflection problem becomes manifest at this screen gain. Reflections overlooked in haste, now are seen to be major problems. Remember the approximate equivelance of 1mS duration for a flight distance of one foot in air. The upper trace then shows about 58 feet of soundwave travel.

RD-75 3m free air suspended impulse at a Screen Gain of x5, and 58mS duration.

A sharp postive and negative going spike is seen immediately following the main impulse - that is the reflection from the microphone stand. Later comes a lower level extended sequence, which is unclear in origin, but the rear wall of the stage and/or the hanging stage curtains are possible origins. At about 2/3rds of the plot trace is seen the main reflections from the rear wall of the auditorium. Following will come several further dissections of the impulse as the screen gain is increased more-and-more to reveal the actual state of the potential semi- or quasi-anechoic status of the data.

RD75 1m free air suspended CSD plot 3mS duration & 1/12 octave smoothing.

The CSD plot at left was originally displayed here, and is in ERROR!

That plot is now seen to be in gross error due to the reflections in the impulse data. This understanding came as a result of my contact with an ex-Bohlender-Grabener employee. He must remain anonymous, but on December 8, 2002 he wrote me the following verbatim in regards the RD-75:

"As far as the driver's actual abilities, I found (and then lost, apparently; someplace on my HD is a set of MLS plots of the RD's) that they suffer a series of bad breakup modes: I think I once measured some 50% THD at one watt around 500 and below; there is a nonlinearity around 1khz, another (that I personally find very audible) around 3khz, the infamous 5khz peak, and some ragged stuff from there on out to a premature, brickwall rolloff in the early teens. While the 5khz item is visible on any amplitude plot, the 3khz is not, requiring a fairly nearfield MLS to highlight, at which time it shows up as a sizable trail, confirming at least my own ears. Further, there are the inevitable nuances that extend far deeper than these; HP of the absolute sound once referred to a subjective "greyness" plaguing the sound evident upon extensive familiarity. I suppose that without a surface behavior measurement system we're all just speculating about what else is at play here. The housing cavity and that partial-drive, tight film technology do appear to have their issues..." [Anonymous ex-Bohlender-Graebener employee, December 12, 2002]

What he wrote to me above was quite troublesome, in context of both what I've heard from the RD-75 and from comparison published CSD plots in audiophile magazines. That is, how could the RD-75 bare driver free air cumulative spectral decay be so bad? I decided it was time to bite the bullet and take a new hard look at the old raw data. There was that nagging microphone stand reflection in the raw data I remembered.


Dipole Baffle Study Report#20.
Cumulative Spectral Decay Plots (waterfall) - Free Air, Bare Driver, Page 1.
Cumulative Spectral Decay Plots (waterfall) - Free Air, Bare Driver, Page 3 - NEXT PAGE.
Cumulative Spectral Decay Plots (waterfall) - Free Air, Bare Driver, Page 4.
Cumulative Spectral Decay Plots (waterfall) - Free Air, Bare Driver, Page 5.
Cumulative Spectral Decay Plots (waterfall) - Free Air, Bare Driver, Page 6.
Cumulative Spectral Decay Plots (waterfall) - Free Air, Bare Driver, Page 7.
Dipole Baffle Study Report#22.
The RD75 Dipole Baffle Study - Table of Contents
Acoustic Line Source Research - Table of Contents.