![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Go to….
Selecting a project |
Selecting a DIY project: |
|
There's a temptation common to beginning DIY'ers to try to go from novice to
dream system designer in one big step. Resist this temptation! Select a
project that is a little more challenging (both technically and financially)
than your current level of experience. Not all DIY projects turn out well. If
your reach exceeds your grasp, you may find yourself with a pile of expensive
components that sound terrible. Not only is this a bad investment of your
time and money, it will also discourage you from trying again. As with any
investment, the secret is to optimize the ratio of risk to potential gain. A corollary of this principle is that, if you're a complete beginner, it might be a good idea to begin by building a kit or other predesigned system, then work your way up to a "from scratch" DIY design. In Section 15 of the LDSG, I list a number of available kits, what drivers they use, and their prices. |
Selecting a system and drivers for DIY projects: |
|
An integral part of any DIY project is selection of the drivers. If you're
building a kit or working from a set of plans, in most cases this has already
been done for you. Still, even in the case of a kit, many different drivers
can fit into the same panel cutout and you may wish to select alternatives.
If you're building from scratch, driver selection is a required part of the
design process. Despite lots of agonizing by many DIY'ers, driver selection
isn't rocket science.
Note that in all of the preceding discussion, the term "sound" really refers to timbre matching. No matter how neutral, all speakers will still slightly add their own unique aural stamp to the sound they present. The easiest way to achieve timbre matching is to use either identical drivers, or similar drivers, preferably from the same manufacturers.
|
"Hoffman's Iron Law": |
|
One of the most fundamental design principles that the new DIY speaker builder must
learn is generally known as "Hoffman's Iron Law". First formulated back in the
early 1960's by Anthony Hoffman (the H in KLH), Hoffman's Iron Law is a
mathematical formula that was later refined by Thiele and Small, whose work now
forms the basis of all modern loudspeaker design. Hoffman's Iron Law states that the efficiency of a woofer system is directly proportional to its cabinet volume and the cube of its cutoff frequency (the lowest frequency it can usefully reproduce). The obvious implication is that to reduce the cutoff frequency by a factor of two, e.g. from 40 Hz to 20 Hz, while still retaining the same system efficiency, you need to increase the enclosure volume by 23=8 times! In other words, to reproduce ever lower frequencies at the same output level you need an extremely large box! However, box size isn't the only variable… You can continue to use a small box by accepting a much lower efficiency. In order to retain the same sound pressure level (SPL, meaured in dB's), though, this requires both a very large amplifier and a driver that can handle a lot of power and move a lot of air (requiring high excursions). Furthermore, it must be able to do so with minimal distortion. This is exacerbated by power compression, a phenomenon where the power heating of the driver's voice coil results in a non-linear relationship (read "distortion") between the electrical power in and the acoustical power out. Another variable not often mentioned is bandwidth… You can provide the perception of violating Hoffman's Iron Law by using a bandpass design, which can provide a lot of bass primarily across a very limited bandwidth. In all too many bandpass designs, the impressive bass is produced around a single frequency. This is often referred to as "one-note bass". It can rattle the furniture and impress your friends, and may even be OK for sound effects in action movies, but don't expect too much accuracy when listening to music with a lot of low bass content. Summarizing, Low-frequency capability, box size, and efficiency form the three key aspects of system design. To increase any of the three, you have to give up something from the other two, with box size being the most sensitive. The often unpopular bottom line is therefore to plan on using the largest box you can comfortably live with. This partially explains the popularity of subwoofers, which can be both large and hidden from view, and often include their own built-in high power amplifier. |
Enclosure types, aesthetics, & gallery: |
|
OK, now you're ready to begin making implementation decisions…
|